5 Comments
User's avatar
Paul Stanley's avatar

Hedge funds are first and foremost designed to benefit the founders of the hedge fund, investors might benefit and equally they might not.

Expand full comment
Joachim Klement's avatar

What a cynical world view you have. We all need to make a living. some do it by becoming a teacher, nurse or doctor, others by investing and charging 2+20. Where's the difference? 😉

Expand full comment
Paul Stanley's avatar

My lord, my client wishes to enter a plea of guilty to the charge a being a cynical old fool 😁

Expand full comment
FrankFrank's avatar

The difference dear Klement is that the teachers, nurses and doctors, do not make exorbitant gains by exploiting mugs.

Expand full comment
Kalamakis's avatar

Fully agree, (most) hedge funds cost a lot and underperform a simple cheap ETF.

A GREAT example is RIT Capital Partners - a publicly-traded investment trust run by the mythological Rothschild family. Underperforms massively since 2022, it has a lot of private equity and hedge funds in it.

Theoretically it should be a copy of the Yale portfolio - giving you access to amazing funds like Mithril Capital, Millennium Partners, and more.

Practically it just costs you a lot of money in fees, and underperforms a simple cheap ETF.

Another hilarious example is Bill Ackman's fund- another publicly traded fund. I remember reading someplace that he has such high fees that just to beat a simple ETF he will need to make 30% PER ANNUM. No wonder he spends so much time on Twitter- you need a lot of marketing to sell such a overpriced product.

Expand full comment