15. Sack anybody whose opinions don't exactly match your own or who has pointed out what they see as a flaw in the plan. Honest discussion and diversity of thought are the death knell to running organiations.
A serious well considered paper. However it omits essential features including: make copious references to ‘stakeholders’, ‘human rights’, and being ‘progressive’. While you can continue to show contempt for the working class and the aspirant, show Emotional Intelligence with references to support of minority interests even though you despise them. Etc.
Yep. Masterpiece! 😀
Absolutely made my day.
And mine...sharing this immediately. Worthy of a young Nigel Lawson for insight and acerbity. Thank you for digging it out and sharing.
Brilliant!
I would add
15. Sack anybody whose opinions don't exactly match your own or who has pointed out what they see as a flaw in the plan. Honest discussion and diversity of thought are the death knell to running organiations.
A serious well considered paper. However it omits essential features including: make copious references to ‘stakeholders’, ‘human rights’, and being ‘progressive’. While you can continue to show contempt for the working class and the aspirant, show Emotional Intelligence with references to support of minority interests even though you despise them. Etc.